Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreenBrowser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

GreenBrowser

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable web browser. Prod contested on the basis of inclusion in browserchoise.eu, but inclusion is not the same as substantial coverage. (See recent discussion Articles for deletion/TheWorld Browser.) Pnm (talk) 23:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Do not remove this article. Njbob (talk) 00:08, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Would you care to explain why it should be kept? -- Whpq (talk) 14:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - PC World review via the Washinton Post, PC World Polish review, About.com coverage, PCPro review are all coverage where GreenBrowser is the primary subject. Note that a Google News search also includes lots of Asian language results.  I didn't investigate these as I would have to rely on machine translation, and the preceding sources are sufficient to demonstrate notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Withdrawn by nom per Whpq's sources. --Pnm (talk) 03:20, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.