Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Bus Lines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 05:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Green Bus Lines
non-notable, now defunct corporation Heah talk 19:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I greatly appreciate everyone that patrols NewPages, but next time, could you give please wait more than 4 minutes before tagging an article like this for AFD? It can scare off new users.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 03:37Z 
 * I live here and used the buses all the time in Mill Basin and occasionally to get to the airport; it wasn't because of article length/quality/my ignorance that i tagged it. But i guess you still have a point and will try and follow your advice in the future.  apologies.  --Heah talk 04:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * And a royal mess of an article. Delete. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 22:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete -- a.n.o.n.y.m  t 22:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Could you please explain your reasoning for voting "Speedy delete"? &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 03:33Z 
 * Delete. Beyond repair. Crunch 23:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable. "Defunct corporation" has quite a different connotation from "mass transit provider of New York City which was taken over today".  http://www.greenbus.com/.  The funny markup is apparently because the anons are trying to create a table using unfamiliar wiki table syntax.  I don't consider this "royal mess" to be "beyond repair".  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 03:32Z 
 * Delete per above Werdna648T/C\@ 10:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet the notability requirements as listed in WP:CORP. Atrian 11:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.