Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Frog Studios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — Mets501 (talk) 04:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Green Frog Studios

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

NN-webcomic delete Cornell Rockey 02:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NOTE, and WP:WEB requirments, the article does not WP:CITE sources, content is admitted to be from the primary source which does not abide by WP:RS and WP:V guidlines. Article reads like a first party self-promotion meaning that WP:OR and WP:VAIN may also come into play. -- wtfunkymonkey 02:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Confirmed all that wtfunkymoney said. Fails almost everything!--155.144.251.120 03:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails at life. -Toptomcat 13:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourced, certainle fails WP:WEB.-- danntm T C 19:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not very notable, no sources to back it up.  Gan fon  20:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't DeleteNo, don't delete, fix, go to their site and use the info there to fix. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jlhc (talk • contribs) 01:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC).
 * Doesnt matter what info the site has it can't be noteable self references.--155.144.251.120 04:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lack of sources and fails WP:WEB.  Insane  phantom   (my Editor Review)  12:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.