Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Gas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Green Gas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no substantial references for this term in this context. Google finds only hobbyist blogs and advertisements.What it does find is several other meanings, including the general concept of a replacement for natural gas that is less environmentally damaging.  DGG ( talk ) 05:59, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, with possible selective merge (but no redirect) to Airsoft gun. Note there are "black" and "red" gas canisters as well - . If kept, this article at the very least needs to be renamed to something akin to "Airsoft Green Gas".Icewhiz (talk) 13:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- I like Icewhiz' logic. One line of this article should be merged to Airsoft gun, which already says about all there is to say. This article would unlikely ever expand. As to whether the title should change to "Airsoft Green Gas" as a REDIRECT, I am ambivalent. The most likely search term will be green gas.  FWIW, every propellant gas has eventually been found to be problematic. See Aerosol_spray.  Eventually green gas will fall under criticism, too, with the green part debunked (my editorializing). Rhadow (talk) 14:06, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Rhadow - this is green because of the packing color - it is used to shoot an air gun - so I'm not sure this will be debunked, but its commercial name might change.Icewhiz (talk) 14:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.