Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Links


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 17:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Green Links

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Speedy deletion template removed by an IP, however the advert tag was added. Much of this article is about the issues this organization aims to tackle, and all non-primary sources are about thise issues, not about the organization.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)


 * As the article's creator, I can assure you that there are non-primary sources concerning Green Links; however, since the majority of news reports discussing the project are over 10 years old, they are now archived and not free to the public. With time, I am sure I could locate articles that are free to access that could be used to cite information on the Green Links page. -User:Jmil158 —Preceding undated comment added 03:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You can look for pages archived by Wayback Machine at Internet Archive: Wayback Machine.
 * —Wavelength (talk) 17:31, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. It is of sufficient notability. Note that it is a project rather than an organisation. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 00:11, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Steam5 (talk) 00:49, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  00:03, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable project. No indication that this is other than a lcoal project using standard methods.  DGG ( talk ) 06:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.