Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Spaces


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:44, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Green Spaces

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Obvious spam that is G11-eligible in my mind, but was declined as such so taking it here. This is excluded from Wikipedia as being an obviously commissioned work created in violation of our terms of use with promotional language that exists for the sole purpose of promoting the subject (WP:NOTSPAM/WP:DEL4/WP:DEL14.) It is referenced bombed, but does contain some in-depth coverage from the NYT's regional section, so might be notable, but the notability guideline is clear the simple passage of the GNG is not enough to guarantee inclusion if the subject fails WP:NOT. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete textbook paid editor cruft; the references are mere mentions (which perhaps the NYT source being an exception) which do not satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH, the terms of use violation is what tips this over the edge. jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:34, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The NYT ref is indeed the best in the article and that I've been able to find myself. Even that though is about green share working spaces in general and not exclusively about this company. It's obviously created by an already-blocked sock too. SmartSE (talk) 19:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the above, not enought references to meet the criteria for establishing notability. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP -- HighKing ++ 16:10, 26 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.