Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green day untitled eighth studio album


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Using my magical, spirital powers, I predict... seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  14:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Green day untitled eighth studio album

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Future album articles supported only by blogs ^without any hint of an official title^ are a violation of WP:CRYSTAL and should be deleted. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL and WP:HAMMER. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL Waterden (talk) 17:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above: speculation. Cliff smith  talk  17:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Violates WP:CRYSTAL. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  17:22, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Delete it now! For reasons above. Nouse4aname (talk) 17:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Just delete. ~ Auzemandius {talk/contrib} 18:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, it's supported by articles published by Reuters and MTV News, rather than by web logs. Uncle G (talk) 18:23, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. That's fine for a few lines in the main Green Day article, but a separate article is not necessary at this stage, and will likely just become a posting ground for fans to post every minute update. As per WP:NALBUMS, "unreleased albums are in general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources". I don't think this is the case yet. Good job finding better sources though! Nouse4aname (talk) 18:35, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, STOP.......Hammer time.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 00:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I've added an more reliable reference - an article from BBC online - but it still doesn't amount to much yet. IMO albums should never get articles until they at least have a confirmed title. Grutness...wha?  00:46, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — Hammertime in the snow! MuZemike  ( talk ) 03:16, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.