Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green ink


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 02:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Green ink

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP is not a dictionary. This is a very minor jargon expression. Jaque Hammer (talk) 05:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 19:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - An interesting exposition, but Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. Carrite (talk) 17:30, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.