Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenbelt (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:16, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Greenbelt (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created by developer and added to by its "artist". Even this, which is cited to in the article, indicates that the game is barely releasable let alone notable. Bbb23 (talk) 23:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. It looks to be too soon for an article at this time, especially given that it's not even released yet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per toosoon and COI criterion. – Alex43223T 01:38, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't seem to have any substantial coverage from reliable sources. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete No reliable sources found on Googling this. Ethically (Yours) 12:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essentially, per above. WP:TOOSOON to be able to pass WP:GNG. No independent sources. (For reference, IndieDB is self-published.) WP:CRYSTAL as an unreleased games. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 11:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.