Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greene's


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Greene's
PROD removed with the comment "This show rocks and deserves to be in Wikipedia". Who knows, but I see no evidence that this meets WP:WEB. --W.marsh 17:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, this does not meet the WP:WEB guidelines.--Isotope23 17:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. -- Kinu t /c  19:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per above will381796 22:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I see no evidence of it rocking. Yomangani talk 00:03, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This show definetly deserves to be in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.116.31.252 (talk • contribs)
 * AfD is not a vote. Please state your rationale for this recommendation. -- Kinu t /c  18:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Yomangani. AgentPeppermint 18:39, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep it The pilot for the show will be online in a week. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.74.47.243 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment That doesn't matter. The pilot showing does not make this show notable.  If the pilot is good and gains a lot of popularity, then it could become notable. will381796 01:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep it In the opinion of all those who've seen clips of the pilot, the show is already "notable". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.74.47.243 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per nom. *drew 04:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.