Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of RPI buildings. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was previously deleted and recreated but both the prod and speedy tags were removed. No independent sources are provided to establish notability nor are there any claims that might otherwise indicate it is anything other than a run of the mill university campus building. TM 20:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I created this article about 10 years ago, but to be honest I can't remember why. Not very notable. Would consider merging into a List of Buildings at RPI page, but no such page exists anymore. Danski14(talk) 21:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:07, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect or merge, probably to List of RPI buildings. I created the list-article to address the main complaint of this AFD. For this university and others, I wish that there should be no further AFDs created for separate buildings.  Any marginal buildings can always be merged/redirected to a suitable list-article, which should be created rather than debated. -- do  ncr  am  20:03, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the List of RPI buildings page.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the List of RPI buildings page. I did try to source it; came up empty.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.