Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenhill School (Addison, Texas)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈  06:59, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Greenhill School (Addison, Texas)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Most of the references and citations link back to primary sources, and a Google search shows no links to any verifiable websites. Further more, this article is written in the style of an advertisement, and almost all of the the information in the article is redundant, and should not be in an encyclopedia. More proof of the article's being an advertisement is that the articles history shows that one of the main editors, who repeatedly edited the article, had the username Greenhillmenstennis. It is clear that this user has personal ties to Greenhill School. For the reasons previously listed, this article should be deleted. Ethanlu121 (talk) 00:05, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 1.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 00:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  01:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  01:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Procedural close or fix - this is the disambiguation page for several valid school articles. The actual AfD target appears to be Greenhill School (Addison, Texas). I'd fix it if I knew how. VMS Mosaic (talk) 04:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. For the technical reasons mentioned by VMS Mosaic, and because the nominator doesn't state any grounds that would justify deleting the school article. This is a substantial K-12 school with plenty of coverage evident in basic searches; there is no doubt it's notable under Wikipedia's customary standards for schools. Any issues with the current version of the article can be addressed by editing. --Arxiloxos (talk) 06:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Needs a bit of work, not deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep both school article (per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and general notability) and dab page (if anyone thinks the dab page has unnecessary entries, note that "Ysgol Greenhill School" is a wonderful bilingual confection meaning "School Greenhill School" so could well be sought under plain English "Greenhill School"!) Pam  D  09:44, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, the currently linked page is a valid disambiguation page, not an article about a school. -- do ncr  am  02:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and gng Jacona (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.