Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenlighting hoax


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus / keep. - Turnstep 22:49, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Greenlighting hoax
Reference to an obscure, irrelevant event that has no encyclopedic value whatsoever. Fancruft. RabinicLawyer 22:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable fancruft. incog 22:56, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, Slate article linked seems to show that it has some value, and isn't "obscure" or "irrelevant." --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 23:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jeff. JoshuaZ 00:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Kuralyov 00:31, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --Liface 01:36, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per badlydrawnjeff. Note especially the mass media coverage. Gail Wynand 04:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-noteable. --ElKevbo 04:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep- it made it to Slate, which implies some degree of significance. RMG 04:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep --AlbertHerring 04:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Donkay ote 04:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable. MrKeith2317 04:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not at all notable, fancruft. Possibly merge into another article. Deleuze 05:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It was discovered too quickly, so didn't become notorious or notable. Thatcher131 11:28, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Neither notorious or notable, it's just too niche. --Gmaxwell 18:14, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep fancruft isn't a word. --The_stuart 19:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * See Fancruft. Stifle (talk) 00:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn forumcruft Pete.Hurd 21:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per Badlydrawnjeff. Kuzaar 20:02, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Smerge to Something Awful Forums. Won't be remembered after a year. Stifle (talk) 00:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * keep please this is not obscure or irrelevant Yuckfoo 17:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Insignificant, even with an article or two about it. -Objectivist-C 22:20, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.