Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenpants Publishing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Jamie ☆ S93  15:37, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Greenpants Publishing

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod (removal of tag).

No reliable sources given or found to establish notability of a business. Google news searches: "greenpants publishing", "green pants publishing". Also, zero web hits for "greenpants publishing". tedder (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable, probably a hoax. Even the article insists that it's unverifiable. Hairhorn (talk) 15:16, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, likely a hoax. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

* Speedy keep. Failure to follow WP:BEFORE should be considered a violation of WP:CIVIL and against WP:CONSENSUS. A discussion among the people who happen to come here is inadequate. Use the talk page and give it an adequate period of time before deletion. Give it some time. -- Biaswarrior (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails verifiability in rather spectacular fashion. -- Whpq (talk) 18:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Checkuser confirmed sock. J.delanoy gabs adds  19:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment, Above users only edits have been to vote "Keep" on AfD's, and remove ProD's. Wuhwuzdat (talk) 19:41, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.