Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenpunk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 19:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Greenpunk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable non-movement with minimal coverage. The manifesto itself indicates there are no known examples of the genre. Blackguard 04:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Stylistic genre that appears to be made up and purposefully obscure. Wisdom89 ♦talk 08:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notability is dubious, based on what I'm [not] finding, but more importantly there's no article here to speak of. No claim to significance or even an explanation of what it is. At best this is a WP:TNT scenario. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 04:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.