Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreenroomGlossary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

GreenroomGlossary

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This was nominated by an IP editor with the less-than-helpful rationale "screamingly unencyclopedic". That said, they may have a point: an article about a temporary exhibition at a college doesn't sound all that notable. Community input would be welcome. ➨ ❝ ЯEDVERS ❞ a reasonably good buy 19:47, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - the article appears to be original research and the stated purpose in the article is in contravention of not a web hosting service -- Whpq (talk) 21:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried google searches for three variations of the title, and always came up empty. The article itself seems partly promotional (WP:COI), somewhat blog-like (WP:NOT)and overall non-notable. Since I can't see how it can ever be improved, it should be deleted.– sgeureka t•c 14:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Minor local thing, non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 00:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.