Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenstone Pictures Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 14:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Greenstone Pictures Limited

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable company. Google search for "Greenstone Pictures Unlimited" turns up 20 results. There's also heavy COI as someone affiliated with the group wrote the article, although to be fair, neutral editors have tried to clean it up a bit. CyberGhostface (talk) 02:53, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete - no significant coverage of the company itself, according to Google News. Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 03:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The documentaries/reality series that they have produced as well as their own technical abilities have received awards at the highest level in New Zealand as can be seen here . This together with the shear number of popular shows they have produced in New Zealand, and other non-trivial results in the Google news search gives me the impression that they are notable. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 04:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Greenstone are notable for their production work. The qantas tv awards are not lightweight media backscratching awards. The article still needs plenty of work to knock it into shape. However, there has been good work on it so far. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep notable proven. We66er (talk) 19:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  16:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable per awards. Article needs cleanup as Wiki does not need an included list of every project they worked on.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Note that searching for the full legal name of the company reduces the number of hits. Also, when they win awards, these are usually listed as name of show + individual producer or director rather than the production company. (Hence the list of shows is useful, particularly to a New Zealander who will recognize many of them). dramatic (talk) 07:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.