Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greentelligence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Greentelligence

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Neologism. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 17:14, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Delete - Greentelligence is a self proclaimed neologism that is not notable. It appears to be trade marked by http://greentelligence.ca/ and is used as a trade show buzz word. Pmedema (talk) 19:26, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete—SPAM/NEO Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 19:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. SPAM by stealth. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. That is most probably spam by an unknown hillbilly trade show. --213.196.253.64 (talk) 10:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Speed delete per the above, as spam/purely promotional.  Captain Screebo Parley! 14:44, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Captain Screebo, if the article's sole purpose is to promote the trade show it should be deleted as spam. Ducknish (talk) 17:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.