Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenwald Rabbinical family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Greenwald Rabbinical family

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No claim to any notability and no evidence of any notability. The single source is a self made family tree with the same reliability as a blog. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 21:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep or Move to Category:Greenwald Rabbinical family or Category:Greenwald Rabbis. --תנא קמא (talk) 22:01, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * delete Wikipedia is not a genealogical project. Notability difficult to verify. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:16, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 03:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 03:39, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 03:40, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 03:40, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment - possibly quite notable, though I would like to see sources discussing them as a set (many of the individuals, also those redlinked, are clearly notable and have entries in other wikis). At the very least, some of the content should be merged to Greenwald (currently missing some of our own blue links, and a comment there on the rabbai line is due - to help our poor readers when they see a rebe Greenwald (which may refer to quite a few different rebes)).Icewhiz (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree with Icewhiz in the following sense that although the family tree is itself not notable, and is already partly present in Moshe Greenwald, those names that have an article should be merged into Greenwald. Debresser (talk) 12:27, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 01:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources do not establish notability of the family as a whole. Useful content besides the family tree itself can be merged. Reywas92Talk 05:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.