Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenwizard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Greenwizard

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The company is very borderline on notability. There are some mentions in local media and minor media, no major coverage. Only source given is the company's website. Article is written in a general promotional tone, although it is not promotional enough to qualify for g11. Delete Safiel (talk) 03:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. I hate to actually !vote to delete an article, but this is an unfortunate exception. The article does read like a promotion, and unfortunately with no further citations it is hard to reword it in a way which it isn't. Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:17, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.


 * Speedy delete, article is entirely unambiguous advertising. Yet another non-notable  tech startup advertising on Wikipedia: ....a technology company offering the most comprehensive web-based software platform for green building materials from thousands of manufacturers.... the only data-driven marketing solution that brings green building products face to face with decision makers in the design and construction community actively engaged in projects.... the most advanced analytical tools and information available..... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:17, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G11  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * *Delete, as noted above, this is unambiguous advertising. Article was created by an SPA.Dialectric (talk) 20:53, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.