Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenwood tarot deck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Greenwood tarot deck

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has been unsourced from the outset and, though this Tarot deck is out-of-print, bordering on advertising (the wiki article about its author is even more self promotional). From an internet search I can see the Greenwood tarot deck existed but I can find hardly anything in the form of reliable coverage (books, news articles, reviews). The bect I can find is a short explanation of the product's history by Ryan himself in a book. Is this Tarot deck remarkable or important enough for this lengthy (or any) Wikipedia profile? Can it be merged elsewhere or redirected to Mark Ryan's article? Sionk (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:47, 6 January 2014 (UTC)


 * delete I too get nothing; in particular GBooks seems to return nothing but spurious hits in other tarot decks. Mangoe (talk) 14:57, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.