Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Coffey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep (NAC)  Garibaldi Baconfat   00:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Greg Coffey

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Per WP:BIO1E, person is notable only in their role as a single event, so he is not generally notable. Vast majority of coverage in secondary sources revolves around a single event in his career. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 06:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've thought this one over for a bit, and from the amount of sources (google and google news have quite a few), the level of involvement, and the sheer amount of money (the reason why it was covered) make me think we should keep it.  ceran  thor 13:47, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Anyway, I think that this part of a wider [conspiracy], i.e. to delete some articles that are revealing the truth about some controversial figures. We all know very well who are behind these conspiracies. -Mazarin07 (talk) 16:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep needs expansion from available sources; probably notable as a financier even before this story. DGG ( talk ) 19:18, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.