Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Cosell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:33, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Greg Cosell

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Fails WP:BIO. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - WP:BIO is an entire page of notability guidelines for people. What aspect of this guideline page qualifies this nomination? Northamerica1000 (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Meets WP:BIO notability standards. Article subject in question is the subject of multiple published secondary sources included in reference list (including two New York Times articles). In addition, the article subject meets notability standards for creative professionals 1:The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors, and 4:The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.  Elj1201 (talk) 07:07, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep reasons stated by Elj1201 are compelling, can not see how article fails WP:BIOTjc (talk) 07:57, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 12:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 12:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources already included in article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly meets WP:BIO based on the sources in the article. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly meets BIO, GNG, and any other notability standard that would apply. "Fails Bio" is not a reason without further details.--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.