Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Frankson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 16:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Greg Frankson
Article appears autobiographical, vanity:
 * article apparently created and maintained largely by one User: User:pill75;
 * maintaining userid shows up at livejournal.com with [a profile] consistent with the subject of this article.

Article has a non-notable subject:
 * failing professor test;
 * failing Google test, considering that lead results all appear to be created by or directly on behalf of the subject), only 618 results in total;
 * failing subjective "100 year test (future speculation)".

Well-honed skills of self-promotion and local recognition in limited contexts is insufficient to merit inclusion in Wikipedia.

Drapeau06 21:22, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Somebody want to try for a speedy?  --Dennisthe2 17:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep- Very informative article.Adv. P. R. Bijuchandran 14:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not suggesting that the article is wholly uninformative. However, even if we assume it to be accurate, it must meet other criteria for inclusion in the encyclopedia, and I'm suggesting that it fails there. I could write an article about myself (as it appears the author did in the case of this article), but that doens't mean it's worth including in Wikipedia. Drapeau06 21:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.