Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Miller (photographer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Yellow Dingo &#160; (talk)  00:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Greg Miller (photographer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A7 was declined but there is no claim of notability, one ref is own website and other ref is a series of photos from The Daily Mail which in itself confers no notability? Fails WP:BIO. Paste Let’s have a chat. 07:24, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I've added to the article regarding his Guggenheim fellowship. Gab4gab (talk) 22:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 00:53, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as the introduction paragraph on both new sources give a narrow pass of WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 00:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:40, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Guggenheim fellowship is enough to pass WP:ARTISTS. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:14, 10 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.