Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Van Zant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Greg Van Zant

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Recent controversy shows that this page only existed to put the individual in a bad light. While I, for one, am sure that all the links painted a truly accurate picture of this man, I can see nothing that warrants this guy having his own artilce. This is an orphan article that provides no useful information. Certainly there are far, far more accomplished coaches than this guy. Timneu22 (talk) 17:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of reliable sources, and the fact that he most certainly has not reached the "fully professional" or "highest amateur" level of his sport. Quantumobserver (talk) 18:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of sources, lack of notability. -- Scjessey (talk) 18:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely non-notable.-- Giants27 (  t  |  c  |  r  |  s  ) 01:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks sources that are reliable and independent of subject. BRMo (talk) 03:30, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree with the nominator; delete. ClintonKu (talk) 09:51, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.