Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Wood (actor)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  kur  ykh   00:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Greg Wood (actor)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable actor for whom the article claims two IMDb profiles. Passes db-a7, but even combined these collections of single TV episodes and the like do not meet the WP:ENT standard of "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions," etc.  Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 09:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - I disagree with deleating the page because the actor played a significant main role in Brookside from 2002-2003 and was one of the three lead roles in the spin off DVD. Also, although his character in Coronation Street is only classed as a recurring role his is getting more screen time as the storyline he is involved with progresses. Grrrreg 09:16, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Storyline over. (See also List_of_minor_Coronation_Street_characters_%282009%29.)  THF (talk) 01:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The storyline isn't over yet Grrrreg 12:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. And whoever maintains List_of_Brookside_Characters didn't find Wood's role in Brookside notable. THF (talk) 01:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:Grrrreg and actor meeeting WP:ENT . Since article also notes his pervious name Greg Milburn, we have even a wider search available that gives us more with which to WP:Verfy his work, , , . While meeting the GNG is prefered, guideline allows other means by which to confirm notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm not sure what those links are supposed to show—they're all Google searches that don't turn up very many hits.  Your GNews archive search is particularly instructive, since all that seems to come up are passing parenthetical mentions; these are as insignificant as a media mention can possibly be.  No one's disputing that Greg Milburn or Greg Wood exists or that his roles are verifiable, but neither you nor Grrreg (the article's author) has indicated what part of WP:ENT he might meet.  Obviously that'll take more than verifiability.    Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 23:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Only intended to show that his ENT might be verified through a wider search, as the criteria required to meet ENT if failing GNG.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. A handful of minor guest appearances on British TV does not meet WP:ENT.  Most notable role was as a loan shark with a few lines in a five-episode arc of a daily soap opera. THF (talk) 01:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 05:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.