Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregor Ehrlich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Gregor Ehrlich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable consultant. Trivial content, minor award. One of the 3 coauthors of a unsuccessful book with only 86 library holdings.  DGG ( talk ) 03:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: Subject has won a significant award in the early era of digital media. That is just enough to satisfy WP:BIO. CooperDB (talk) 13:56, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find no reliable sources. Sources here are things like a Youtube video and a LinkedIn site. The "knives thrown at a pizza" award is a joke. Literally. LaMona (talk) 20:13, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * There are several reliable sources cited in the article. True, none of them are really independent, but since the subject satisfies the award criteria of WP:BIO, the WP:GNG is not necessary for the subject to be considered notable. CooperDB (talk) 13:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * CooperDB, other than the page linked, I can find no other evidence that the Showtime Alternative Media festival exists. The domain name alt.sho.com redirects to sho.com. The link cited is to a press release. So we need something more to make this a significant award. As it is, it looks like alt.sho.com was quite short-lived. It appears to have been launched in 2000, and not heard from again after the first round of awards. There's no year on the PR Newswire article. LaMona (talk) 14:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is a violation of WP:BLP. There are zero reliable sources, and even assuming everything is true, his work has been run of the mill, to be blunt. We are not a web host for every radio host. Bearian (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.