Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregor Hans Schöner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Gregor Hans Schöner

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently this guy ran a failed dotcom from 1999 to 2001. Who among us didn't, really? I don't think that's sufficient to establish notability. Also, of the three sources in the article, none are about the subject of the article and only one even mentions him by name. Newsaholic (talk) 00:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: No reliable sources that show notability per WP:BIO. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 01:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete (EC) No reliable, third-party sources can be found for this article topic. Fails WP:BIO. -Atmoz (talk) 01:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--no notability here, no relevance. Drmies (talk) 03:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:11, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability per WP:BIO barely even asserted. No RS coverage for Schöner. Only RS provided gives a brief mention of his company's product. Searches bring up mostly false positives and nothing reliable about this person. • Gene93k (talk) 11:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete because not notable, no RSs. I already deleted a supposed reference that linked to a completely unrelated piece of advertising. --Matt's talk 23:33, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.