Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregor Laubsch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Gregor Laubsch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I stand by my claim from the original prod that this fails notability. All sources seem like regional or specialist magazines, no coverage in mainstream sources. All awards look minor. Nothing to suggest encyclopedic notability that I see so far. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - if subjects have significant coverage in reliable sources then they meet WP:GNG - there's no requirement for the sources to be "mainstream". However, I agree with the nominator that the list of awards and prizes seems very weak, while the article itself makes little claim to importance. Starting with a self-quote from a facebook page is a very bad start! However, there seems to be some coverage about Laubsch in published photography magazines, for example and . Despite him living in Berlin for several decades, I haven't found much coverage in German yet. Sorry, I'm a bit undecided at the moment (though swaying towards a 'very weak keep'). Sionk (talk) 21:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  00:07, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Searched for sources, this is a very active photographer in different blogs and photo communities (there are a lot). But did not find a sign that he could fulfill the criterias in WP:CREATIVE. --Ben Ben (talk) 20:34, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.