Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Dayton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:10, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Gregory Dayton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent evidence of notability. This was BLPPROD'd, and the BLPPROD was removed, replaced with three references, but two of the references are to Wikipedia, and one is a genealogical entry. Google search shows nothing but the usual vanity hits, an obituary of someone else with the same name, and an unreferenced article for him in the Spanish Wikipedia (whose standards are different). This appears to be identical to the Spanish entry, but that doesn't establish notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:33, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete appears to have a few minor roles in notable films, but no major roles. Without more credible references, he's not notable. Power~enwiki (talk) 20:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources include a genealogy website and that's it. Nothing suggests he meets WP:CREATIVE or such. With the sourcing/content provided, not notable for encyclopedia. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist 1 1 1 22:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.