Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory L. Smith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:01, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Gregory L. Smith

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

after due diligence performed there is still WP:Notability concerns, no Independent references or reliable sources. Does not qualify under Wikipedia:ANYBIO guidelines or Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) SosoStalin (talk) 17:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 25.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  18:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. All references provided at the article are self-referential. I could not find any independent sources about him at Google Books or at Google News Archive (he does get quoted a few times by the Deseret Times). --MelanieN (talk) 15:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- well-written article that improves the encyclopedia, but unless references can be found, does not pass the notability requirement. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 19:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.