Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Michael Stanley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was G10'd . Amortias (T)(C) 18:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Gregory Michael Stanley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Violates WP:BLP1E and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 00:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 00:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 00:01, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Delete: Woah, major WP:Wall of text and fails violates WP:BLP1E. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. BLP1E and abuse of Wikipedia. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC).
 * Delete. Violates WP:CRIMINAL in multiple ways (no conviction, no evidence of significance to the case, and we generally don't make articles about perpetrators or alleged perpetrators of misbehavior). Plausible G10 speedy. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with nom and above participants. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  14:13, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are situations where we cover criminal allegations before conviction or trial (certaily the Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse cases story comes to mind). But they concern the cases of public figures, where there's been a lot more evidence and the allegations themselves were notable. That is not the case here. The subject of the article is not a public figure of any kind, not notable for anything else, and the only coverage this story received seems to have been in relation to the subject having been a college roomate of the actor Jim Parsons. Basically does look like a G10 case to me. Nsk92 (talk) 14:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination - Wikipedia is not the place for this sort of agenda-pushing. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:58, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete most accused abusers of minors are not notable for this enough to justify having an article on them on Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:43, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:G10. I have tagged the article accordingly. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:21, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.