Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Raifman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 12:06, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Gregory Raifman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article which asserts WP:BIO and fails. Also asserts WP:COI and mixed/broken references, which don't asserts any notability. Simple puff piece. scope_creep talk  00:15, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 01:11, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:55, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, I do not see reliable sources demonstrating notability at this point.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 23 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  18:27, 24 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I too see no reliable sources demonstrating notability, mainly just the standard PR stuff. --Boson (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: There appears to have been a snafu in the previous relisting. It looks like Davey2010 relisted it properly, but then Joe Decker did a duplicate relisting here, reverted himself, while commenting out the transclusion on the August 24 log page but failing to revert himself there.  Retranscluding to the current day's log page.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Finngall  talk  20:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.