Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Richards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:19, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Gregory Richards

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable fictional character. Article is not written in an encyclopedic tone, and does not cite any sources. Seacactus 13 (talk) 20:12, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:12, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not a fan Wiki for every TV show ever made.TH1980 (talk) 01:20, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is supposed to be built on secondary source coverage which is entirely lacking in this case. We are not Wikia, and now that Wikia exists we have no reason to pretend that we are.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:07, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Delete - I found no coverage to suggest that this character meets WP:GNG. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC) Changing my vote following the sourced improvements. Thanks to for the work and  for the ping. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:54, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of stand-alone notability.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC) Update: Changing to abstain for now after improvements. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  04:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge  Did some searching and found a few sources for the character, including two award nominations. Rather than delete the article though, it would be better to merge it to an appropriate list, such as List of Sunset Beach characters, allowing the references I found to be kept. - JuneGloom07 Talk  00:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment – I've since found more coverage, including an award win for the actor, and I believe the character now passes WP:GNG. - JuneGloom07 Talk  00:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: To consider the HEY improvements.
 * Keep - It was originally nominated on the basis that it cited no sources. It now has reliable, secondary sources being added. Not every fictional character is notable but I think this passes.Rain the 1 19:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Improvements made to the article since nomination have shown that the character meets GNG, with lots of in-depth coverage in RS. – DarkGlow • 21:44, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:14, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. It would be good to ping folks who voted delete and presumably didn't see the rewrite. So . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.