Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Stafford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Gregory Stafford
Non-notable political staffer of not many years' experience. Mtiedemann 09:23, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * userfy and delete - article created by subject, fails WP:BIO - Politepunk 10:41, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Works for someone notable, but not notable himself. Zaxem 11:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable &mdash;M e ts501 talk 15:17, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree. - Richardcavell 23:33, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. maybe vanity. Newyorktimescrossword 02:07, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy and delete from article-space. No indication of being cited in reliable sources.  I'm not persuaded that the political-staffer job nor being an officer of the groups listed are enough to get past WP:BIO.  Article creator's only contributions Special:Contributions/Gregorystafford have been to his own bio, that of another political flack, and a group of which both are officers.  WP:VAIN.  Barno 02:17, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.