Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Zapantis (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Gregory Zapantis
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a procedural nomination, as I have no strong opinion on the article's existence. The article's creator has been trying to get it deleted (via speedy and prod), with the rationale "relatives requested this page with his info to be completely deleted from wikipedia"; but no speedy-deletion criterion is applicable, and the article can't be prodded, since there was a previous AfD in 2013 (with low turnout and a "no consensus" result). As a result of the creator's efforts, it's completely unreferenced at the moment; the last version with refs is here. Though a request by relatives is not a reason for deletion, I think a case can be made for nonnotability here. Deor (talk) 07:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not seeing anything other than very brief references in the media (eg on restaurant reviews, recipes etc), so under the circumstances I think it is fair to say that the subject is not notable as per WP:GNG. JMWt (talk) 08:14, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, as per above. Even without the subject's relatives' requests this could easily have ended up here again and been deleted as non-notable. Lacks the coverage required to demonstrate such notability. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, there are a couple of sources that mention him, but his mention is tangential to the point of the articles. Can't find many reliable non-primary sources in which he is the topic of the article, rather than simply mentioned. &#160; Discant  X  08:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, I have just reverted the article to a previous version with references and external links. --Racklever (talk) 09:05, 4 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.