Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grenada–Holy See relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Grenada–Holy See relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. nothing more to these relations than diplomatic recognition. Roman Catholicism in Grenada covers other aspects of this relationship. LibStar (talk) 02:54, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 03:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Any content worth saving should go in Roman Catholicism in Grenada or Foreign relations of Grenada, but there's very little unique content to be saved. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - I look at other relations with the Holy See and have the same number of detail as this artcle. I found the facts and you don't need to have Google to keep this artcle. You need the real information and put it in the artcle, so in the future, when someone search it out, it will be automatic show about the relations with the Holy See and Grenada.(Kylekieran (talk) 15:58, 4 July 2012 (UTC))
 * the topic is not subject to significant coverage in third party sources. please read WP:N. LibStar (talk) 02:22, 5 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge to Foreign relations of Grenada – There's not enough significant material here to justify a separate article. Regards, RJH (talk) 20:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. The few facts in this article can be merged with one of the articles previously mentioned, if necessary. CodeTheorist (talk) 21:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I would merge the information into both Roman Catholicism in Grenada and Foreign relations of Grenada, or keep it. The three articles overlap somewhat, but are distinct. Bearian (talk) 17:45, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * you can't merge and keep. Please decide. LibStar (talk) 10:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
 * One or the other, I do not care, and I can not decide. You decide. Bearian (talk) 17:27, 17 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:21, 18 July 2012 (UTC)


 * There's absolutely nothing wrong with a "merge or keep" (or a "merge or delete") vote. --BDD (talk) 19:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking indepth coverage in reliable sources. If such sources are added tot he article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:04, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.