Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grenada–South Korea relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 15:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Grenada–South Korea relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. there is very limited relations between the countries. one very minor visa waiver agreement, a one off grant from South Korea. no embassies and no state visits. LibStar (talk) 01:05, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Ridiculous article Nick-D (talk) 03:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, important relation for Grenada. Grenadian-Korean relations are complex and historically notable due to the Grenadian revolution and US invasion (N Korea sent troops there, although just a handful). Here are some reading on Grenada-S Korea relations; http://thenewtoday.gd/local-news/2012/09/24/equipment-south-korea/, http://www.openaiddata.org/purpose/381/151/742/ , http://www.ipsnews.net/2012/07/south-korea-offers-marine-technology-to-developing-nations/ , http://enewsletter.kf.or.kr/?menuno=2689 , http://kor-carib.mofa.go.kr/eng/last/1st_forum_tab01.jsp , http://www.gov.gd/egov/news/2012/nov12/20_11_12/item_6/grenada_receives_vechicles_south_korea.html . Prime Minister Eric Gairy visited South Korea and concluded an economic agreement in 1976, see https://books.google.com/books?id=Y4FyAAAAMAAJ p. 259. --Soman (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * South Korea gives aids to a lot of countries, but the assistance to Grenada is not really significant. USD20000 and 3 vehicles is hardly ground breaking. LibStar (talk) 03:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * It's more important to Grenada than to the ROK clearly. --Soman (talk) 05:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 05:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Coverage in reliable secondary sources is limited. For instance, I see a mention in a small Grenada newspaper, a very brief IPS mention, and then some mentions in primary sources. This nowhere near enough. Nwlaw63 (talk) 15:08, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep While not the most important bilateral relationship, an almanac is only useful if it is complete. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * how is this an argument for notability? There is no requirementpolicy for bilateral articles to be part of an almanac on WP. LibStar (talk) 14:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep The bilateral pattern of coverage in appropriate sources demonstrates notability here. Alansohn (talk) 05:50, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, a compromise would be to merge the S. Korea and N. Korea articles into Grenada-Korea relations, a topic that is definately (considered the turns around the Revolution in Grenada) notable. --Soman (talk) 17:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:08, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.