Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gretchen Hillmer Bonaduce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Gretchen Hillmer Bonaduce

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested WP:PROD, nominated for WP:NOTINHERITED rationale as a small-time actress and reality TV star focused on her then husband. Minimal if not any decent coverage at all with one major coverage from a "free weekly community newspaper" and the only major source (LA Times) covering her divorce. Donnie Park (talk) 17:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete I agreed with the PROD, and I agree with the nominator now. Notability is not inherited, and she fails WP:ACTOR and WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as simply nothing compelling for any independent notability here. SwisterTwister   talk  04:13, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet GNG. The only sources I can find a of the "celebrity gossip" type, and in particular those where the "celebrity" participates. No mainstream coverage. LaMona (talk) 04:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete because a) I proposed deletion via PROD and b) everything said above. Brianhe (talk) 11:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.