Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gretchen Rhodes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Gretchen Rhodes

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Failed a WP:BEFORE search. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 22:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 22:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 22:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 22:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing notable about her. Just a singer. Oaktree b (talk) 23:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I believe the subject of article meets notability guidelines. Shas performed with and contributes with many notable musicians and performers. However, I understand this is subjective. Would appreciate input or insight for how to improve the article instead of delete it. JDMCMAH (talk) 23:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Addressing :@Such-change47 comment. I understand that notability is not inherrited - and phrased my comment poorly. The artist is in a trio with two notable musicians, so I do believe that the artist meets item 6 of the guideline WP:SINGER. Additionally, the artist contributed materially to two gold selling albums. JDMCMAH (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete: after checking the guideline at WP:SINGER I do not consider this singer to have met the notability criteria listed. Referring to the above comment, notability is not inherited. I note that merely failing to meet guidelines does not necessarily mean the article needs to be deleted. However looking at the totality of not meeting guidelines and having very little if any sigcov, the article both fails to meet guidelines and also does not have any compelling alternative reason to remain and so should be deleted. Such-change47 (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see the kind of coverage necessary to surpass WP:GNG or WP:BLP.--Paul McDonald (talk) 04:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn’t meet WP:SINGER. -Xclusivzik (talk) 07:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete there isn't significant coverage, and it also fails WP:SINGER and WP:GNGJuggyevil (talk) 16:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:SINGER MaskedSinger (talk) 06:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.