Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greteman Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:52, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Greteman Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for small advertising agency. Promotional elements include: list of all executives, list of minor charitable contributions, list of non-notable clients, sourcing almost entirely from unreliable PR sources.

Unwisely accepted from AfC  DGG ( talk ) 20:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 14 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete agree that it appears to be promotional in nature. Aside from that, the company appears to be fairly prominent in the Wichita area due to the large amount of local coverage.  But if the company was truly notable for our purposes here, we'd find more articles in business journals outside of Wichita.  Is there a "WichiPedia"?--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Greetings,

As a representative of Greteman Group, we greatly appreciate your feedback. We're working to update our Wikipedia page to address the concerns listed above.

Thank you, Rachel Groene Greteman Group — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.116.146 (talk) 20:35, 14 November 2013 (UTC) 
 * Comment Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free web hosting service. Please understand that it isn't "your firm's page" but instead a page about your firm.  If you work for the firm, there is a strong argument for conflict of interest as well.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:54, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 19:51, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.