Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GreyCampus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NorthAmerica1000 04:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

GreyCampus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. WP:SPA creator removed prod; seems like promotion. Boleyn (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article describing project management, then Six Sigma, then ITIL - really just setting out a firm's wares. Multiple searches (Highbeam, Questia, Google) turn up no evidence that they are notable. AllyD (talk) 19:47, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article tone is completely promotional and full of weasel words. Would have to fully rewritten, and no sources establish notablity. ~ Anastasia &#91;Missionedit&#93; (talk) 23:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (cackle)  @ 20:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (jive)  @ 20:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (chat)  @ 20:35, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (proclaim)  @ 20:35, 1 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - a quick search turns up little beyond their own press and promo. Even their own press releases are lackluster. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 03:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am unable to find sources in WP:RS with information about this company. Almost a WP:CSD candidate. -- Kinu  t/c 00:30, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.