Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grey Out


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Grey Out
Article reads mostly as ad copy. Googling on Grey Out as an industry term 1 returns some hits, but the articles found seem to always mention "Tub-Rite". It seems less of an industry term and more of an advertising term for one company. Vslashg 20:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

This article could be edited such that it focuses more on grey out, rather than solutions to get rid of it. The polymer chemistry described is patented and is not marketing hype. The frequent reference to "Tub-Rite" is where I see the potential marketing problem, and this could easily be addressed in an edit of the article.
 * Delete, probable copyvio and seems to fall under WP:VSCA. Stifle 16:43, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Johnleemk | Talk 06:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:Copyvio (block quotes from website) and WP:VSCA (advertising). --Kinu 06:54, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Google search ("grey out" tub shower) returns no hits to industry sites not related to the commercial site the article is stumping for. --Fuhghettaboutit 06:56, 4 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.