Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greyhawk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was CANCELLED. Point-making nominator is cruising towards a speedy block, let alone a speedy keep. -Splash - tk 22:49, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Greyhawk

 * Delete This article is fancruft WP:CRUFT. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collections of information-- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cryogenesis (talk • contribs).
 * Keep. This was the first official campaign setting for D&D, the current default setting, and one of the most popular. The above user is just being spiteful because his Dreadmire & related articles have been determined to be non-noteworthy.--Robbstrd 17:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. For one, Greyhawk is not only the first official campaign setting, it's technically the current official campaign setting for D&D. Furthermore, this article does not fall under any of the mentioned guidelines under indiscriminate collection.  And as WP:CRUFT says, it in and of itself isn't a reason for deletion, it's the fact that fancruft is "often poorly written, unreferenced, unwikified, and non-neutral", all qualities for which this article definitely does not fall under.  I don't even see an actual reason for deletion for this page.--Idran 19:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep bad-faith nom. Danny Lilithborne 21:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, nom is disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. Article denotes one of the oldest and most established Dungeons and Dragons campaigns, the subject of numerous RPG products and at least a dozen popular paperback novels.--Rosicrucian 22:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Obviously. -- Ec5618 22:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.