Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greyhawk literature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Greyhawk literature

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a trivial list of in-universe works that fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 15:30, 1 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to Greyhawk. BOZ (talk) 21:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not really seeing this one. The content seems incredibly trivial. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:28, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Very trivial cruft with no independent sources, and not even a claim of notability. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 19:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - cruft in extremis. Neutralitytalk 03:30, 8 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.