Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greystone Books


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 14:44, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Greystone Books

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Thinly sourced to a trade magazine. Not seeing in-depth coverage. Notability is not inherited by virtue of publishing notable books Slywriter (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Slywriter (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.
 * Related discussions:  ←
 * --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.