Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greyweather productions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:58, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Greyweather_productions
Seems to be a mix of advert and vanity. Correct me if I'm wrong RattusMaximus 00:49, 14 November 2005 (UTC)RattusMaximus


 * Delete. Certainly written in a mix of vanity & advert style, and even if re-written in a more appropriate way, there is no demonstration that this production company (which appears to be a one-man operation, incorporated quite recently in April 2004) has as yet any claim to notability. No mentions of it or its productions outside of its own website.--cjllw | TALK  04:53, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, vanity. Dottore So 12:50, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advert, vanity, nn.
 * Delete, vanity, all is vanity Avalon 16:20, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. nn vanity. RasputinAXP   T    C  18:46, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete advertising and vanity per nom. Gatecrasher 19:57, 14 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.