Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gridrunner Revolution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Gridrunner Revolution

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Sourcing is to web forums and self-published sources. No independent demonstration of notability. Durova 318 00:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The majority of Llamasoft's/Minter's previous titles already exist on Wikipedia Disciple
 * Keep As a forthcoming game by a notable developer, this article should be kept. First previews of the game are starting to appear (such as the gamesmaker preview), notability will increase in time, as evidenced by numerous articles in mainstream gaming press about gridrunner+++, the development name of this game.PullTheWires (talk) 00:33, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete with option to recreate when and if notability grows.Whitespider23 (talk) 09:36, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep now that additional sourcing has been added. Whitespider23 (talk) 06:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Independent sources have now been provided on the page. Harlequin (talk) 10:27, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep As a forthcoming game by a notable developer. For what other reason does the 'Upcoming video games' category exist?
 * Keep Forthcoming game by a notable developer, as a result the article should be kept and has now been edited to respond to the criticisms made.--Gaunt (talk) 10:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Minter is an extremely well known games designer and any substantial upcoming title from him seems a natural fit for the 'Upcoming video games' category. Moreover the article itself seems both thorough and well researched, release of the title is imminent and there is considerable media interest in it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.8.158 (talk) 14:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep see Pull above. - Ret.Prof (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable company and creator, here are a few sources that took all of two seconds to search for. Eurogamer - GiantBomb citing coverage in Edge Magazine. An AFD could've easily been avoided, but instead we all have to do the dirty work instead of one person doing a simple google search. Vodello (talk) 17:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.