Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griffin's Chocolate Thins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 18:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Griffin's Chocolate Thins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The topic does not meet WP:GNG. News source searches and those in Google Books are not providing significant coverage in reliable sources. Furthermore, claims in the article such as "'Thins' are a popular and top-selling biscuit brand" and "It is generally accepted that most people require an even number of 'Thins' as they are almost always eaten in the form of a 'Chocolate thin sandwich'" are entirely unsourced, the former of which is advertising for the product. NorthAmerica1000 03:36, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 03:37, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 03:38, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - its possible there are a few "styles" of biscuit that are notable (in the same manner as digestives or piroulines for example) and that "thins" or "chocolate thins" are a notable style. But brand-specific chocolate thins are unlikely to be notable and I'm not seeing any evidence that this brand's product is notable.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 04:35, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per . I don't see any notability after looking around, there maybe some tweets about the biscuit and it is still not enough.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 09:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete please - at best it might get two words under a list of Griffins products. Not notable at all. NealeFamily (talk) 07:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree, not at all notable.CoronaryKea (talk) 10:56, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:19, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.